Apr 05, 2022
In General Discussions
Adherence to science and religion ceases to be based on two different knowledge schemes based on different legitimacies and slides towards the plane of cultural identifications14. The 21st century marks the transition from an unquestioned perception of science that prevailed since the end of the 19th century towards a more distanced view that questions the association between indefinite progress and limitless scientific development.fifteen. Science and its development, associated with power and money, are perceived from more ambivalent positions: progress is questioned above all ethical background and limits to its intervention are demanded. The cracking of the discourses considered legitimate for centuries and the questioning of institutions fertilizes the swampy and fragmented ground from which conspiracy theories and movements of angry citizens feed, which propose Whatsapp Mobile Number List. In 2020 fears, isolation, the health and economic crisis fed them. In a year in which death has approached everyone through acquaintances, friends, relatives and from the screen of the media, at a time when restlessness and doubt sweep the global world like winds, these theories have grown fat by loneliness and confinement. In this context, the dispute between science and religion is seen as anachronistic and displaced from the center of the scene. Science and religion now seem like two old contenders who recognize their agreements seeing the growth of new threats carried by subjects with different codes. That they are also willing to destroy their old and familiar world. As the electoral campaign approaches, many of the myths that made Bolsonaro attractive are dissolving in the face of the sad realization of what he has always been: a charlatan, known for his aggressiveness and authoritarian posture.